Wednesday, 2 May 2018

Ollie Pope and Amar Virdi evidence of Alec Stewart's plan for a home-grown Surrey

Ollie Pope and Amar Virdi evidence of Alec Stewart's plan for a
home-grown Surrey
[ad_1]

Old Trafford on a diluvial Friday afternoon. The first day of the game between Lancashire and Surrey has just been abandoned. The normally well-attended Primary Schools' Open Day has been limited to a Mascots' Race and even that became a straight five furlongs on the outfield rather than the Chorlton Gold Cup.

But if Manchester is conforming to its glum stereotype, the same cannot really be said of Surrey cricket these days. Officials at The Oval have striven mightily to demolish their reputation as metropolitan flash-Harrys who think they can build a team with a flourish of their cheque-book. Seven of the side which defeated Hampshire last Monday had come through the county's Academy system, albeit the greying Rikki Clarke is more an Emeritus Fellow than an ambitious PhD. student.

What is more, two of that heptad, Ollie Pope and Amar Virdi, played leading roles in what was a notable victory. In other words things are unfolding rather as Alec Stewart, Surrey's director of cricket, has planned.

"Since coming into this role I've wanted to bring Surrey players through," said Stewart, who is beginning his fifth season in charge. "When I took over there were a lot of people who had been brought from outside but I believe we now have a nucleus of players who understand what Surrey is and what it means to play for Surrey. That rubs off on everyone and sends a clear message that we give our own an opportunity."

"In the past we've been accused of being a cheque-book county and some of that was fair. Will we ever lose that tag? We're trying but it is a question of people's perceptions. Recently we've had a few who have come through as professionals and they are beginning to perform. There may be one or two years when we don't have that quality but as a rough guide my aim is that 60% of our staff should have come through the Surrey system. That's my challenge to the academy and age-group set up. And recently there have been some nice stories. Rory Burns first played for us as a nine-year-old, he's now our captain."

But anyone who has run a first-class side knows it isn't as simple as preferring local players. There are few things more dispiriting for younger players than the rhythm of defeat. Stewart judges people in such adversity because, "that's when you see the true person" but sometimes it is necessary to recruit from overseas. Any county with the means to sign Kumar Sangakkara would have been daft not to.

"I want to sign a top-class overseas player for what he can do out in the middle and how they can help our players," said Stewart. "Sangakkara was brilliant. Anyone batting with him for two hours in the middle learned a lot more than he would have done from having three months with a coach. Ben Foakes is the best example because and he and Sanga had a lot of good partnerships and now Ben's batting has really kicked on."

It is, though, about so much more than talent. Cricket is revelatory of character and tests players in ways no other sport quite manages. And even when players seem to have emerged as fledged professionals they still need guarding.

"I'm trying to protect our younger players in the same way that Alex Ferguson protected Ryan Giggs when he was perceived as a superstar at the age of 17," said Stewart. "There is so much media and social media now that young players can start believing their own publicity. That's the biggest concern but you can also have bad times as a young player, so we want to promote our own in a controlled way.

"They need to understand this is just the start. They can be taken in and then spat out very quickly. All we are saying to them is keep your feet on the ground. There will be dips in the graph but we don't want there to be crashes. I want people writing about our players in a nice way but I don't want the players in a situation where they might come out with a quote which makes sense at the time but which will make them look silly six months down the line. As their careers grow their media coverage can grow."

Stewart knows many of his principles are also pursued elsewhere but applying them at Surrey presents its own challenges. It is important that the county does not miss players, whether they emerge via a more traditional public school route like Pope, who went to Cranleigh, or the more unconventional pathway trodden by Virdi, who attended the Guru Nanak Sikh Academy. And having identified a talent, Surrey will never prevent them coupling their cricket development with further education.

"We have an excellent scouting system and I'm big on making sure we don't miss players," said Stewart. "And we will never tell a player not to go to university. We tell them cricket may not last for ever so get your education done. There are times when we don't pick academy players because their A Levels are coming up. In gap years we might suggest they go to Australia and we will line them up with clubs and coaches we know and then get feedback on them.

"When players go up a level and find there are other players as talented as them, some will work even harder to succeed and others will drop off because they don't like the competition. You have to see if they will stand up in professional sport, which is cut-throat."




[ad_2]

Source link

Modi government betters pension plan for elderly people

Modi government betters pension plan for elderly people
[ad_1]

नई दिल्‍ली: केंद्र सरकार वरिष्‍ठ नागरिकों के लिए बहुत बड़ी खुशखबरी लेकर आई है. अब प्रधानमंत्री वय वंदना योजना (PMVVY) के अंतर्गत वरिष्‍ठ नागरिक 15 लाख रुपए तक निवेश कर पाएंगे. इससे उन्‍हें हर माह 10000 रुपए पेंशन मिलने का रास्‍ता साफ हो गया है. यही नहीं इस योजना का सदस्‍य बनने की अंतिम तारीख भी 4 मई 2018 से बढ़ाकर 31 मार्च 2020 कर दी गई है, यानि अब वरिष्‍ठ नागरिक इस बढ़ी हुई तारीख तक इसके सदस्‍य बन पाएंगे. पहले इस योजना में निवेश सीमा 7.5 लाख रुपए ही थी. यह फैसला केंद्रीय कैबिनेट की मंजूरी के बाद लिया गया है. कानून मंत्री रविशंकर प्रसाद ने इसकी पुष्टि की है. उनक मुताबिक निवेश सीमा प्रति परिवार 7.5 लाख रुपये से बढ़ाकर 15 लाख रुपये करने से वरिष्ठ नागरिकों की सामाजिक सुरक्षा का कवर बढ़ जाएगा.


एलआईसी दे रही है 8 प्रतिशत रिटर्न
केंद्र ने यह कदम सामाजिक सुरक्षा बढ़ाने के उद्देश्‍य से उठाया है. प्रधानमंत्री वय वंदन योजना (PMVVY) भारतीय जीवन बीमा निगम (LIC) चला रही है. इसका उद्देश्‍य 60 वर्ष से ऊपर के लोगों को सामाजिक सुरक्षा देना है. सरकार के मुताबिक मार्च 2018 तक कुल 2.23 लाख वरिष्‍ठ नागरिकों ने इस योजना को ग्रहण किया है. इससे पहले वरिष्‍ठ पेंशन बीमा योजना-2014 प्रभावी थी, जिसमें 3.11 लाख वरिष्‍ठ नागरिक पंजीकृत थे.


क्या है पीएमवीवीवाई
इस योजना के तहत सदस्यों को 10 साल तक 8 प्रतिशत सुनिश्चित रिटर्न के रूप में पेंशन मिलती है. वरिष्ठ नागरिक मासिक, तिमाही, छमाही या वार्षिक आधार पर पेंशन लेते है. यही नहीं रिटर्न 8% से कम आने पर सरकार उसकी भरपाई करती है.


कैसे ले प्रधानमंत्री वय वंदना योजना की सदस्‍यता 
वित्त मंत्री अरुण जेटली ने इस पेंशन योजना की शुरुआत 2017 में की थी. इस उत्पाद को ऑफलाइन के साथ-साथ ऑनलाइन भी सबस्‍क्राइब किया जा सकता है. इस योजना को माल एवं सेवा कर (GST) से छूट दी गई है. पेंशन लेने के 3 साल बाद नकदी जरूरतों को पूरा करने के लिये खरीद मूल्य का 75% तक कर्ज लिया जा सकता है. पेंशनभोगी की पॉलिसी अवधि के दौरान मौत होने की स्थिति में खरीद मूल्य लाभार्थियों को सौंपा जाएगा. इस दौरान लागत का भुगतान सरकार से सब्सिडी के रूप में एलआईसी को करेगी.




[ad_2]

Source link

Tuesday, 1 May 2018

California leads legal challenge to Scott Pruitt’s plan to weaken vehicle emissions standards – ThinkProgress

California leads legal challenge to Scott Pruitt’s plan to weaken
vehicle emissions standards – ThinkProgress
[ad_1]


California officials have repeatedly vowed not to back down to attempts by the Trump administration to weaken the state’s environmental regulations, especially the progress it has made in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.


The state kept its word on Tuesday when California Attorney General Xavier Becerra said he is joining more than a dozen other states in filing a lawsuit challenging an EPA determination, published on April 13, that the fuel efficiency requirements for cars and light trucks are too stringent and must be revised. At the direction of EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, the agency is now in the process of rewriting those standards that aimed to slash carbon dioxide emissions from vehicles.


In the lawsuit, California and the others assert that the EPA has violated the Administrative Procedure Act, failed to follow its own clean car regulations, and violated the Clean Air Act, Becerra said Tuesday at a press briefing in Sacramento, California. He was joined by Gov. Jerry Brown and Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board.


“My message is simple to the EPA: do your job,” Becerra said. “The state of California is not looking to pick a fight but we are ready for one, especially when the stakes are so high for our people and our planet.”


At the press briefing, Brown did not hold back — he referred to Pruitt as “outlaw Pruitt,” accusing the EPA chief of “running roughshod” over the health of the American people and the climate by seeking to implement standards that would weaken the rules already on the books.




In the lawsuit, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, California, together with 16 other states and the District of Columbia, argued that the EPA failed to follow its own regulations and violated the Clean Air Act by issuing a notice that it planned to reevaluate emission standards for model year 2022-2025.


The federal standard the states are suing to protect is estimated to reduce carbon pollution equivalent to 134 coal power plants burning for a year and to save drivers $1,650 per vehicle.


Joining California in filing the lawsuit are Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, and the District of Columbia. This coalition represents about 43 percent of the new car sales market nationally and 44 percent of the U.S. population.



In 2012, the Obama administration approved new auto emissions standards, with 2018 model year vehicles required to average 38.3 miles per gallon of gasoline and 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025. The 2025 target was set as part of a compromise reached between the Obama administration and the auto industry.


According to the Los Angeles Times, Pruitt wants to freeze fuel economy targets at the levels required for vehicles sold in 2020, and leave those in place through 2026. Instead of average vehicle fuel economy ratcheting up to 55 miles per gallon by 2025, it would stall out at 42 miles per gallon, the newspaper reported last week.


In April, the EPA announced plans to roll back tailpipe emissions standards for automakers established by the Obama administration. The decision is expected to increase greenhouse gases and other harmful emissions from the transportation sector — the largest carbon-emitting sector in the nation.


According to Pruitt, proposed greenhouse gas emission standards for cars, pick-up trucks, and sport utility vehicles for model years 2022-2025 are too aggressive. The EPA is working with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration to develop a new rule setting greenhouse gas emission standards.


At Tuesday’s press briefing, Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board, said Pruitt wants to roll back the vehicle emissions standards “based on no new information or facts.” He is seeking to halt the progress that regulators and the automotive industry have made toward building more fuel efficient vehicles that emit less harmful pollutants, Nichols said.



The Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) accused Pruitt of basing his determination about the emissions standards “almost entirely on auto industry statements, without any independent analysis.”


“Scott Pruitt is recklessly disregarding the vast technical and economic bases for America’s Clean Car Standards, and instead launching an all-out attack that risks Americans’ health and their pocketbooks,” EDF General Counsel Vickie Patton, said Tuesday in a statement. “We fully support the states’ legal challenge to Pruitt’s unsupported and unacceptable action.”


The complaint represents Becerra’s 10th lawsuit against the EPA and 17th environmental lawsuit against the Trump administration. Of the 10 legal cases that have reached a conclusion, Becerra said his office has lost none of them.


“So while people may have to decide against believing Donald Trump or believing the state of California, at the end of the day the track record in court between Donald Trump and the state of California is clear,” he said.


The lawsuit is the latest in a build up of tension between California and the Trump administration. Just one day after Pruitt told lawmakers on Capitol Hill last week that the agency did not have plans “at present” to target California’s special fuel economy waiver, the Trump administration reportedly announced plans to revoke California’s waiver to set its own standards.


Nichols, however, said the state has seen only news reports about the Trump administration’s plan to attack the waiver. At the press briefing, Nichols said California would not “dignify” the reports until it hears directly from the administration about any plans to do away with the waiver that would let the state set its own, stronger standards.


If the EPA attempts to revoke California’s waiver, automakers may face years of uncertainty as the California Air Resources Board and the EPA battle over the waiver in court. Courts have continually upheld California’s waiver multiple times since its inception in 1979.




The Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law has released a new report analyzing EPA’s decision to withdraw the standards that concludes the agency’s basis for withdrawing the standards is not grounded in fact or economic analysis. For example, EPA cites factors such as lower fuel prices and concerns about the growth of electric vehicles as reasons to reverse its earlier decision, but both fuel prices and electric vehicle sales are in fact rising.


“In withdrawing the 2022-2025 greenhouse-gas standards, EPA arbitrarily ignored its own prior analysis as well as the facts,” Bethany Davis Noll, one of the co-authors of the report, said Tuesday in a statement. “The agency is acting without clear justification and creating a lot of legal question marks.”












[ad_2]

Source link